Main

The media Archives

July 6, 2005

The First Amendment Weakens

A federal judge today jailed a New York Times reporter for not revealing her sources for a story she was writing about the Bush administration's leak of an under cover CIA operative's name. (The story never made it to print)

Reporter Judith Miller refused to cooperate today in court and was immediately placed into custody. She's to stay there until she complies with the court's order, or is given permission by the source to reveal his or her identity.

Which may never happen. "Outing" an undercover agent is a felony under the Intelligence Identities Protection Act. So that person may not be very motivated to do Judy "a solid."

The New York Times' executive editor Bill Keller defended Judith's actions in the statement below:

Times Statement
July 6, 2005

Statement From Arthur Sulzberger Jr., chairman of The New York Times Company and publisher of The New York Times

"There are times when the greater good of our democracy demands an act of conscience. Judy has chosen such an act in honoring her promise of confidentiality to her sources. She believes, as do we, that the free flow of information is critical to an informed citizenry.

"It has been more than 25 years since Myron Farber, a Times reporter, was jailed and The Times was fined for refusing to provide the names of confidential sources. Subsequently, Mr. Farber and The Times were pardoned and the fines were returned. The case prompted many states to enact shield laws to protect journalists and to help ensure that the public receives information so important in a democracy. I sincerely hope that now Congress will move forward on federal shield legislation so that other journalists will not have to face imprisonment for doing their jobs.

"In the days, weeks and months ahead, The New York Times Company will do all that we can to ensure Judy's safety and continue to fight for the principles that led her to make a most difficult and honorable choice."

Source: The New York Times

So what do you think? Does Judith give up the source in the name of National Security? Or does she keep the source confidential and make a First Amendment stand?

July 12, 2005

Newspaper Sponsored (or not) Blogs

Today's Wall Street Journal looks at the issue of newspaper-sponsored (or not) blogs and the reporters that write them. The story's anecdote is SiliconBeat by Mike Bazeley and Matt Marshall of the San Jose Mercury News

Topics covered include newspapers' responsibility for reporters' postings in their blogs; the use of anonymous sources; 'sanity checking' posts with other reporters before publishing (not a bad idea and something we here at PAN do prior to our posting on PRSpeak); and how newspapers are turning to blogs to compete for reader attention.

Of particular regional note for PAN, the article reports that The Boston Globe will soon allow its reporters to blog

From the article: "Now, more newspapers are warming to the idea of offering official reporter-written blogs. The Boston Globe is considering official blogs following the Mercury News's model. At the Dallas Morning News, more than 20 sports reporters contribute to a blog on the paper's Web site. Their posts must be screened by editors, but a spokesman said that requirement might be dropped."

I think everyone in the PR industry would welcome this trend. Just look at how well its working for Heather Green and Stephen Baker over at blogspotting.

July 21, 2005

The care and feeding of the Media

Informative post over at 101publicrelations.com about the ethics of offering food (and gifts, etc) to reporters covering your client's space.   
 
Developing relationships is so key you really do want to limit your gaffs.  I think most of this is just common sense and knowing your audience.  But if you're interested in finding out more (or think you might have trouble remembering), the site is pushing a book on the subject. 
 
- JR
 
Powered By Qumana

July 27, 2005

Media Consolidation Hits Home

This morning, we heard the news that a newspaper in our own backyard –the Lawrence Eagle-Tribune – had been sold to an Alabama newspaper group. While we here in the Boston area have almost become numb to the news of long-time companies being sold off (Fleet, Gillette, etc.), it’s more of a wake up call to us in the PR industry when it happens to a media company, in this case one of the oldest family owned daily newspaper chains in the state (and one that’s less than a mile from our office). I’ve always held the publication in high regard and they’ve won awards for their news coverage. Will it continue under new management? We’ll see.

Consolidation in the media is taking place at a rapid, almost frightening, pace. Is this a good thing for PR practitioners? My gut reaction is to say, “no,” because this country was formed on the foundation of free speech and with less and less independent vehicles to do that, our free speech becomes limited. But, on the other side of the coin, we have the proliferation of new forms of media, most notably blogs, websites, podcasts, who knows what else the future holds. These vehicles are offering new and different forms of journalism, never before possible.

So, while the old school in me is saddened to see the Eagle Tribune lose its independence, I’m optimistic to what the future holds.


[Technorati Tags: ]

August 2, 2005

Reaching the Female Consumer

Reaching the female consumer can be a challenge for PR practitioners pitching women’s lifestyle magazines.

Editors and reporters at these outlets have respect for PR and understand that information from public relations executives is oftentimes necessary to craft their stories. Believe it or not, they are looking to receive trend and product information! But how can we successfully land coverage?

I’ll restate the obvious – PR people should target pitches to INDIVIDUAL REPORTERS, rather than blanketing all contacts on a media list with one pitch and/or a news release. Pitches MUST be crafted and tailored to the reporter and media outlet in order to succeed – careful study of BOTH are prerequisites to success.

During a Bulldog Reporter http://www.infocomgroup.com audio conference entitled “How to Reach Millions of Female Consumers: An Inside Look at Women’s Lifestyle Magazines,” PR practitioners across the nation had the opportunity to hear from editors with top women’s books. Of particular interest to me, I grabbed tips about how to best approach outlets including Elle, Good Housekeeping, and Family Circle – they are below.

According to Elle Deputy Editor Rachael Combe (not a pitch target for the magazine) the best approach is to demonstrate some familiarity with the outlet, pitching information they would actually cover. To land a feature with this book, pitch trend- or issues-focused information and personalities geared to the adventurous, modern, single woman.
http://www.elle.com

Good Housekeeping Senior Features Editor Mary Kate Hogan stresses that pitches should focus on consumer benefits, not on a particular company. Although general lifestyle topics get a fair amount of play, products are a central focus of this magazine. Hogan looks for a combination of practicality, ease of use and genuine flair. She states “Our readers are somewhat budget conscious, and they appreciate things that are stylish but still a good value. I have to consider that with every pitch.”
http://www.goodhousekeeping.com

Consumer advocacy is the hot button topic with Family Circle. Deputy Editor Nancy Clark explains that her magazine talks about women who make a difference through volunteerism and other community-based efforts. Article coverage ranges from parenting advice, teen issues, marriage, relationships and caring for older parents.
http://www.familycircle.com

All good insider information for those of us trying to land a “big hit” for our consumer clients. More to come…!

August 18, 2005

The Death of Print Media will be Televised

Akamai Technologies today is going to announce that it will chronicle up to the minute online news consumption from across the Internet and make that information freely available.
 
People have for years been migrating from newspapers to the Net for their news.  Now one of the Web's major infrastructure providers is going to show just how much we depend on browsers as our primary source of information.
 
Interestingly, Akamai's President, Paul Sagan was a broadcast journalism exec in his former life. Analysts who had been pre-briefed on the announcement are divided on what the service will provide.  Early speculation holds that journalists and news executives will use browsing habit data to help focus media coverage, which is completely out of print media's reach.  Think about it: if the media could take the public's temperature and cater to it in real time..well why wouldn't it? 
 
What's your opinion about print media?  Is it here to stay, or are its days numbered?   Minute by minute....  
 
 
      
 

August 28, 2005

Fox News issues Public Apology

 
In a somewhat bizarre non sequitur, Fox News just apologized in the middle of its Hurricane Katrina coverage for commentator John Loftus' recent claims that a terrorist was living at a specific home in La Habra, CA.  Loftus even went so far as to give out on the air the address of the home.
 
Fox apologized, said the network has disciplined Loftus, and admitted that the network's carelessness has caused the homeowners living at the address Loftus publicized have experienced some traumatic events since the broadcast.    
 
 
The art of FACT CHECKING is becoming lost by the MSM.  FOX would probably argue that Loftus holds "commentator," not "correspondent" status, so his views aren't subject to the same standards of impartiality.  Which is fine up to the point where his unsubstantiated claims put people in danger--especially in this post 9/11 climate where yahoos are so easily excitable. 
 

September 7, 2005

Product Launch Time of Year

September and October tend to be a busy time for product launches. Keeping in mind that these months are highly competitive in trying to achieve time and mindshare with reporters and customers, the best thing a company do to achieve a successful launch is bring in a PR firm several months in advance of the product launch.

Even if you are unsure of product availability, an early connection to your PR team on what products are on the horizon and which markets they address can make a major positive impact on the coverage achieved and audiences addressed.

For example: If a PR team knows that a new product is being launched in September when a much more advanced, upgraded product will be issued approximately five months later, it can change strategy. Perhaps the PR team can focus on an exclusive piece for the first launch in September when achieving mindshare with reporters is highly competitive and an exclusive is a golden word during this competitive time. While the second launch, with a more impactful product and later time-frame, could take a broad-brush approach.

It all goes back to a simple adage: knowledge is power and power is success.

September 20, 2005

Journos Blogging PR Pitches?

Stephen Baker of Business Week/Blogspotting has an interesting post/challenge to PR people.  In it he asks if it's kosher for blogging journalists (or journalist bloggers--whichever side you're with) to blog the inner workings between journalists (of the more traditional ilk) and PR folk (of the flack variety).
 
So--for now, ignoring the debate over what/who/etc. constitutes a journalist--is it okay for journalists to blog the pitches they receive?  Stephen thinks so and says this would give more perspective on how companies are pitching their line and positioning themselves.  That's cool.  But, would he/they treat all pitches equally?  Meaning, If he/they received an interesting pitch and blogged it, would that then disqualify the pitch's content from potentially turning into a story later on?  I ask because Stephen goes on to say that journalists are "loath to admit that we get story ideas from PR people."  
 
So how would that shake out?  Would the authors of pitches that resulted in a story be sourced in stories that make it to BW Online or the magazine? Jeremy Pepper goes into more detail and brings up some other good points here.            
 
Technorati Tags : , ,
 
 
 
 
 

January 15, 2006

Death of the Press Kit?

Reports of the death of the printed press kit may have been premature; journos at both CES and MacWorld couldn't get enough of them.  
 
PAN was at both shows with wearable technology client Eleksen.  Figuring the printed press kit medium was nearly dead we had brought with us far fewer than in previous years.  We went completely dry at CES days before the end of the show and the team back at PAN scrambled to put together and FedEx additional kits for MacWorld in San Fran, which began right after CES. 
 
Blogs and online press kits aside, it is still the case that reporters want to walk away from a face to face meeting with something in their hands. 
 
Technorati Tags : , , , ,
 
 
 
    
 
      
 

June 2, 2006

Contextual Ads - If They Only Knew What You Wanted

There's no question contextual advertising has changed the world of online publishing.  Just about anyone can publish now and make money (maybe even a comfortable living) doing it, provided they have something compelling to say and a large, willing audience who will listen and hopefully surf the ads served up on the site. 
 
In a man-bites-dog twist to the contextual advertising story, Gizmodo Associate Editor Travis Hudson editorialized yesterday about a company named UpSNAP (full disclosure, a PAN client) which was amplified by Gizmodo's sister blog, Wonkette.   
 
UpSNAP had just released a new text message alert service in conjunction with AlertsUSA, through which anyone with a cell phone can receive news and information about threats to national security, natural disasters, terrorism and their health, including news about the spread of Bird Flu among other infectious diseases.  Alerts USA receives its information directly from government sources such as the Department of Homeland Security, Centers for Disease Control, FEMA, the FBI and the Department Health and Human Services and more.  UpSNAP provides the means to distribute that content via text message to any cell phone and can stream live broadcasts of alerts to provide additional information.
 
In the post Travis reports that "UpSnap has decided to be complete @--holes [sorry Travis, this is a family blog] and try to profit from the potential cataclysmic epidemic of bird flu. The service will inform persons when bird flu has reached their area with a text message."
 
Travis goes on to provide a somewhat backhanded endorsement of the service and then instructs his readers how to sign up for it.  Thank you Travis.
 
While we're enthusiastic about the traffic Travis' post and Wonkette's weigh-in on the subject generated, something struck us as ironic: Travis' having been appalled by the notion of a company providing a service where none existed before, and the ads running on Gizmodo's site, right under Travis' post.  Bird Flu threat alert service, bad; selling Bird Flu masks on Gizmodo, well that's okay. See adds below the post.
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
 
 
 
 
 
    
   
 
 
 

July 25, 2006

Content is King...for a day?

 
YouTube doesn't need anyone else to talk about its popularity, we're all guilty of taking a few minutes of the day to watch a funny video, but the conversation recently moved into interesting territory as noted in yesterday's post by John Battelle.   
 
Is YouTube worth a billion dollars?  I have no idea--how startups are valued vs. what they generate for revenue often doesn't make a lot of sense to the casual observer.  But, John and those in his comments section debate a great point: most of the content on YouTube is copyrighted material.  They say content is king, but what happens when someone else owns the content? 
 
The line gets very blury between copyright infringement and "fair use," which states people have a reasonable right to use copyrighted material for their own enjoyment.  Going beyond that vague definition, either through file sharing or making copies, etc., apparently violates Fair Use. 
 
Just for fun, let's say watching a video from the YouTube service does constitute Fair Use (give it the benefit of the doubt).  What happens, then, when people rip videos from the site and embed them in emails to friends, on their blogs or other sites?   Doesn't YouTube just become another pre-RIAA-neutered Napster? 
 
 
 
 
 

July 26, 2006

Dabble Sucks you In

Mary Hodder, known for her prolific writing over at napsterization (among other accomplishments) just launched her new venture, Dabble
 
Pure social search for rich media.  Very slick.  Upload, find, view, tag and share rich media of all sorts.  Even create and share play lists of videos. It's addicting, as I found out during an hour or so at work.  Dabble requires the interaction of people sharing videos from sources all over the Web and from more than 240 hosting sites which accept video uploads.  Judging from what was already available on the site, the concept has really taken off. 
 
Dabble's "pure" social search for media is similar to  PreFound's social search, which requires the interaction of people to share what they've found on the Web (as it relates to any subject through collections of links, Web pages, data, etc.) collected as users travel the Web and share what they've found about their interests with the rest of the PreFound community. 
 
Social search is getting too big to ignore.  Think of the possibilities of a social search site where everything on the Web--rich media and all other data--was indexed completely by people, rather than a Google-style algorithm. How much more targeted would search results be?  What would that do to the science of targeting ads?  
 
 Other people talking about Dabble:
Top Ten Sources Queen Halley Suitt
 

September 14, 2006

Freelancer Danny Bradbury: How to Connect and Pitching Pitfalls

Freelancer extraordinaire, Danny Bradbury is perhaps one of the more (if not the most) PR-friendly tech journalists out there.  Even though he's busy as hell Danny will almost always give feedback on a pitch, whether the answer is 'yes,' 'no,' or 'maybe so.'  That's gratifying to PR pros operating under the gun.
 
Danny's a rare breed, though.  He's mastered the art of working with PR firms.  He operates a site at itjournalist.com where pr reps can register for automatic notifications about stories for which Danny will need a source.  And he's a regular blogger.  If you work in PR and are a daily reader of blogs, you've probably run across his site.  I'm a little behind with this post but last week he spent a good deal of time putting together some thoughts in a post on how pr-types can better keep Danny informed of their clients' comings and goings here.  Read it.  If you're new to the profession this is a great primer; if you've been at it for a while but have moved away from some of the daily pitching you used to do, this provides great insight into how to keep your skills sharp.
 
Just to give you an idea of the time Danny takes to help people help him, here's an interesting exchange he had with one of PAN's people, Andy Dear: 
 
"Sure, I’ll always read a pitch. I don’t accept a lot of them, though – I find a lot of them are veiled sales pitches. Someone sent one the other week disguised as a feature idea on "things you never knew you could do with a multifunction device".  I was expecting some Make magazine-like thing on how to take apart and hack a printer, but it ended up being brochureware -- "did you know that you can use the Xcorp photocopier to introduce watermarks into photocopied documents, therefore enhancing security?"  That sort of thing.  That isn't a feature, it's a commercial.
 
I'm actually thinking of blogging this point -- feature idea pitches often end up being sales material, or interesting me for an entirely different reason (I might see a flaw in their idea and go after them for an interview with a different angle).  But the truly useful ones are few and far between -- the ones where the PR person has a really interesting, new take on a subject. But that isn't meant as a sign of discouragement -- just a warning that I tend to try to pick them apart a bit, because if I don't, then my editor will."
 
The second paragraph is important.  A lot of PR folks will stop short of really thinking about a pitch and how a reporter has to position a story to his or her editor.  Younger reps or people new to PR sometimes get so excited that they've interested a reporter in a story idea that they fail to realize the reporter is interested in the pitch for reasons other than what the pitcher intended. 
 
That's how coverage backfires and that's why PR reps need to know as much as they can about the reporter they're targeting.  READ the reporter's stories; know what they like, dislike and what makes their writing style unique before pitching them.  AND, take time to look at your pitches with 'fresh' eyes and think of how to poke holes in it.  That's what reporters (or their editors) will do.  If you're not sure about it, have a skeptic read or listen to your pitch and get feedback.  There is nothing worse than setting a client's expectations and then getting an unpleasant surprise when coverage hits. Big thanks to Danny for letting PAN blog this point. 
 
Technorati Tags : , , , ,
 
 
 
 
 
      
 
        
 
 
 

October 18, 2006

The Start of a Disturbing Trend?

Here's an interesting story which may signal the start of a very disturbing trend.  In what is clearly a reaction to more and more people turning to online sources as their primary information outlets, The Boston Globe, the paper of record for Boston and arguably most of New England, is proposing to its employees a new contract that would tie wages to the paper's financial performance.  The Boston Newspaper Guild, a union representing nearly 1000 editorial staff is voting today whether or not to take the deal.  
 
Wow...talk about the erosion of editorial and advertising's "Church and State" lines.  What happens when formerly objective reporters feel obligated to cover only the companies that advertise with the Globe?  Will smaller, innovative but less deep-pocketed companies now be completely ignored?  How does PR compete for a reporter's attention when the issues on the table are to get your client coverage vs. the reporter's need to generate his or her salary?    
 
 
We'll follow this story closely today and provide updates as we can. 
 
 

October 22, 2006

Boston Globe's Editorial Union In Bed with Local Politicians?

Cutbacks in print journalism are taking their toll on people at the Boston Globe.  Last week we blogged about the Boston Newspaper Guild's vote on a proposed contract which would tie the salaries of reporters to the Globe's financial performance, raising the specter of "pay-for-play" journalism.  Luckily the measure was voted down, but not because reporters didn't want to be questioned about their objectivity; the contract was rejected because it didn't include profits from Boston.com, the Globe's online property, which is doing very well. 
 
Now it comes out that the Boston Newspaper Guild lobbied for and got the support of some of Boston's more influential politicians in its bid to get the New York Times Co. (the Globe's parent) to halt the cutbacks.  If the journalists are lobbying politicians to save their jobs, what happens when it comes time to cover those politicians in the paper?   
 
 

November 16, 2006

Trends Bandwagon

I thought I would be among the first to look into the crystal ball for 2007. Here's what I think will be the dominant trends for 07 in the media. Faith Popcorn, I am not.

Continue reading "Trends Bandwagon" »

January 29, 2007

Broadcast and Blogs

Forget for a moment the debate over bloggers pulling content from traditional journalists and vice versa (that's been well played out); one thing PR types have to remember to take into consideration is how broadcast hits translate into Web video and propagate far further through blogs.

PAN client iCache had a great interview at CES with a NBC affiliate station out of San Diego. The station ran the piece, which then got picked up by more than 120 other NBC affiliates (and counting). Exciting, right? Here's the coverage, but check below for a link to the blogs that picked up the video after it ran. Run iCache, run.

This list is a result of just one interview (sure, we're excited for them), but what's astounding is the reach beyond *just* broadcast or *just* blogs.

February 7, 2007

Bloggers and Press Credentialing

Rumor on the street is that a few bloggers were denied press credentials and entry at the GSM show.

Certainly, it is something that tradeshow organizers continue to struggle with. PAN represents a number of tradeshow companies as clients. We counsel clients to deal with it by examining the blog the blogger represents, and check for relevant postings. If the postings are "journalistic" in nature, we usually credential the blogger. We have considered using Technorati to rank journalists, but have decided that it is not fair to bloggers with smaller audiences.

One of our account managers who has run countless press rooms at various trade shows notes that we have denied bloggers press credentials in certain cases. Recently, a company that was not exhibiting at a show sent a corporate representative as a blogger. The corporate blogger wanted to get press credentialed. He was denied credentialing because of the obvious self-serving nature of the corporate blog he represented.

Any other strategies out there for press credentialing bloggers, while protecting the sanctity of the press room and the privileges that come with press credentials? Or is press credentialing bloggers oxymoronic in a democracy?

July 18, 2007

WSJ headed for cutbacks?

Forbes editor: WSJ newsroom may see cutbacks

Former WSJ newsie--and current Forbes Managing Editor Dennis Neil--had some pointed comments on NPR's American Public Media show yesterday (July 17). In light of Rupert Murdoch's bid to acquire the venerable publication, Dennis told host Kai Ryssdal that Murdoch would be wise to make three quick moves: cut the 500-person newsroom to 400, halt production of the Saturday edition, and abandon the poorly performing WSJ European edition.

Personally, I think the Saturday edition is a great read, but biz is biz, right?
-AB

Harry Potter Mania – Thank You to the Media for NOT Ruining the End…

As I am sure everyone is aware, Harry Potter mania is definitely in full swing. However as a PR professional, and someone who works with the media on a daily basis, I was very excited to hear that although it was reported that “spoilers” had received copies of Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows (book 7) and posted the ending on the Internet, not one major news network has released the ending of the book. Sure, they have all talked about the story itself – that someone took photos of the book and is trying to retype them into something more legible, but no one in the Boston media (print and television) nor the national news (CNN, FoxNews, AP, etc.) has released the ending.

Some would say this is the biggest story of the summer so why wouldn’t the media release it? I think most are thinking however, that they would NEVER want to be the news station or newspaper that was associated for spoiling the ending of the most anticipated book of the year – for children and adults.

As a very big Harry Potter fan myself, thank you to the media. For once not releasing breaking news, you have made me and millions others Harry Potter enthusiasts very happy. A surprising twist near the end of the Harry Potter story.

July 24, 2007

Local Papers - Do or Die?

So, reading Heather Green's post today on Blogspotting got me thinking, or should I say, it reminded me of how important local papers are. Local papers are what started the media, then came radio and so on. Do you read your local paper? And if you do, do you read it with the same purpose as you did years ago? I have found myself reading the Nashua Telegraph late at night, and mainly for local events and the crossword. Just a few years ago, I would make time in the morning to read it before I started my day so I would know what was going on in the world. Now, I think I would paralyzed if I could not read my RSS feeds first thing in the morning. How do you get your news?

August 3, 2007

WSJ's next frontier

So now that Rupert Murdoch has bought the venerable Wall Street Journal for a cool $5 billion will he keeps his hands off of it? In other words, will he stay out of the kitchen and let the reporters and editors cook up their own editorial stew? That's a key question as many reporters are no doubt watching how new ownership will impact their independence. As a former reporter, I know that journalists cast a wary eye at outsiders. At the same time, all you can really do is tell it like it is.

To paraphrase the immortal Al Davis, just report, baby.

February 11, 2008

New Orleans: The Next Stop for the NBA’s All Stars

Almost three years after hurricane Katrina, New Orleans is proud to be hosting one of the greatest - and in my opinion - the most entertaining winter sporting events: the 2008 NBA All-Star game. No stranger to housing some of the greatest athletic feats, like the Super Bowl, the Final Four, and the BCS Championship Game, the city is ramping up for what promises to be yet another unforgettable game.

Starting for the West are Allen Iverson, Kobe Bryant, Carmelo Anthony, Tim Duncan, and Yao Ming.

And up until last night, the East’s starters included Jason Kidd, Dwyane Wade, LeBron James, Kevin Garnett, and Dwight Howard. But, don’t hold your breath, sources are now reporting that Boston’s Kevin Garnett will no longer be taking part due to a strained abdominal muscle.

Also missing from this year’s lineup, but not for medical reasons, is Shaq, which is generating a fair about of buzz in the world of sports.

Aside from the game, all stars will also be taking part in the Skills Challenge, the Three-Point Shootout, and the renowned Slam Dunk Contest, where each athlete longs to defy gravity for just a little longer than the last. After all, who can forget Jordan’s famous free throw line dunk!?

Some of my personal favorites will be headlining in the 3-point shooting contest, including Kobe Bryant and Steve Nash .

And hailing from Syracuse, I have to give props to Carmelo Anthony, SU’s National Freshman of the Year in 2002-2003. He never fails to deliver a stellar performance for the Denver Nuggets.

Now, if you’re lucky enough to be heading to New Orleans for the week, like my sister and her sports marketing class at Niagara University, (ahem...no, I’m not at all jealous!) be sure to soak up some of Louisiana’s most delectable dishes, its rich history, and, most importantly, donate to the continuing rebuilding and development efforts.

April 16, 2008

Running a Marathon and Securing the Business Press Hit: Both Require STAMINA

images.jpg

The Boston Marathon is one of my favorite events of the year and will be taking place this coming Monday. As someone who has ran the Marathon, I can appreciate putting a lot of effort into something over a long period of time – with the “finish line” miles away. The same holds true for business press outreach. This week alone, we secured a great hit in the Wall Street Journal for one of our clients and have coverage coming out in USA Today. What makes these opportunities special (in addition to being in two top national media outlets) is that they came to fruition as a result of a lot of diligence, hard work -- and patience over time.

Securing a briefing with a business publication doesn’t automatically equal secured coverage. Relationships with reporters and editors need to be nurtured. Not only do you have to present them with a viable trend/story and then support it with compelling reference points (numbers, customers, analysts, etc.), you need to build a strong rapport with that reporter – during the briefing and beyond. Further, you need to recognize that things come up (a lot) and a reporter may need to push off a planned article. It doesn’t mean it won’t run – it is just not going to run when planned. When this happens, the important thing is to keep in touch with the reporter (without stalking them), letting them know you are a resource for them, while keeping your client top of mind. When done the right way, the article will eventually run and the benefits will follow. So….when it comes to business press coverage…keep your eyes on the prize…and you will win the race!

April 23, 2008

ever changing ways to secure 'coverage'

As PR professionals, we're all looking for new ways to secure our clients coverage and shine that spotlight on their new offerings and unique approaches. Yesterday, the CTO from JackBe, John Crupi was highlighted on a Network World 'Whiteboard' - We're seeing more and more traditional magazines and dailies go the video route - even our backyard paper the Boston Globe is making a point to add more video coverage. Not that traditional media briefings and opportunities have gone away, it's just another way to get your clients message out there. Check it out:

http://link.brightcove.com/services/link/bcpid1243511167/bctid1517411419

About The media

This page contains an archive of all entries posted to PAN Blog in the The media category. They are listed from oldest to newest.

The SMB is the previous category.

Thought leadership is the next category.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

Powered by
Movable Type 3.33